By
"School choice, it seems, should be a no-brainer. Why not give families vouchers, allowing them to make free choices for their children’s education? There’s a reason increasing numbers of inner-city activists in places like Chicago and Washington, D.C., are fighting for charter schools and voucher programs. They know choice would be better for their kids. They know the government has failed them."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/08/14/the_crazy_world_of_public_schools_123654.html


The Crazy World of Public Schools | RealClearPolitics
www.realclearpolitics.com
Are America’s vast, sprawling, powerful government agencies really all that bad? Left-leaning New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, in a recent series of columns and blog posts, has...
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:51:55 +0000
By
LIKE if you agree with the 80% of Kansans who believe that employees should have the right to decide, without force or penalty, whether to join or leave a labor union. http://www.employeefreedomweek.com/survey-results/


Survey Results | Employee Freedom Week
www.employeefreedomweek.com
National Employee Freedom Week has released a series of scientific surveys to find out how many union members want to leave their union and gauging the public’s support for employee freedom. The results were surprising.
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:16:37 +0000

Kansas school funding has been increasing
www.washingtonpost.com
The Aug. 1 news article “In Kansas, a deep-red ‘experiment,’ ” about Kansas’s tax reform, provided incomplete data on school funding. The base state aid data used to show a decline in school funding r...
Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:27:30 +0000
Last Refreshed 8/23/2014 6:02:19 AM
KPIBlog
Print
WILLKOMMEN - Rules and Guidelines
Posted by James Franko on Monday, January 09, 2012

Welcome to KPI's latest effort to help make Kansas a freer and more prosperous place to live and work.  (Please note the use of the German word for "welcome" because who doesn't appreciate a tip of the hat to the native language of the Austrian School of Economics.)

My name is James Franko (sorry, not the actor but this one) and I'm in charge of making sure we get this blog started off on the right foot.  To that end, our goal is to create a place to discuss the public policy questions facing our state. We believe this can be done in a courteous way that allows for all voices to be heard and respected.

With that in mind, please remember that Kansas Policy Institute is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and is governed by rules that will prevent any comments, messages, or other content from being posted that;

  • Constitute a communication in support of or in opposition to any candidate for any public office;
  • Electioneering or lobbying communications within the meaning of applicable federal or state law.

Once again, this is to be a place to discuss, and even debate, the policy issues of the day. This does not include personal attacks, vulgarity, offensive content, spam, or links to things directly selling products. However, we gladly encourage you to post links to other blogs, media outlets, or organizations that advance the conversation and make a meaningful contribution. This means we can delete content that;

  • Is abusive, vulgar, offensive, threatening or harassing language, personal attacks of any kind, or offensive terms that target specific individuals or groups;
  • Off-topic comments or comments that promote services or products;
  • Gratuitous links to sites that could be viewed as spam;
  • Personally identifiable information such as social security numbers, addresses, and telephone numbers.

Something appearing on this blog DOES NOT constitute or imply the support or endorsement of said content by KPI, our staff, or board members. We’re trying to create the free flow of ideas and someone posting a study from the Bugs Bunny Institute for Public Policy does not mean KPI is supporting Bugs Bunny or his policy ideas.

We reserve the right, at our absolute discretion, to remove any comments we feel violate the rules outlined above or the spirit of this blog.

Lastly, while we were all riveted by the debates in Washington, D.C. about raising the debt ceiling or extending the payroll tax cut, we'll be focusing on Kansas issues.  There are plenty of other forums to debate the latest news from inside the Beltway and trust you'll find an appropriate place to make your opinion known. So, unless it deals with a direct impact on Kansas policy (e.g., Medicaid, NCLB), personal liberty, or economic freedom we'll leave those federal topics for discussion elsewhere.

Please e-mail me (james.franko@kansaspolicy.org) should you have any questions or concerns.

Comments:     
Posted by Guest on Tuesday, January 10, 2012
I commend your effort to get people talking about increasing freedom in Kansas!! If we don't take responsibility for protecting our freedom then we will lose it to those who believe they have a right to decide who gets what income and who gets what "rights"--usually defined as a living wage, a job, an education, healthcare, safety, retirement income, etc...things which are not rights at all but things people should have to provide for themselves and should be taught to provide for themselves if they want them. Life, liberty and personal property are the rights that define individual identity; it is these that should be protected. When we think that we have a right to someone else's hard earned wages, which is what is necessary to provide all the wants often referred to as "rights" that I just listed above, then we endanger, indeed violate, the protection of our own true rights. If it's alright for us to take others property to benefit ourselves through the force of government then that same reasoning will be used to take away our own property, liberty and eventually even our own life. Hopefully this site will be able to help people see the truth of this, come to their senses and rise up in protection of our actual rights.
Archives